Monday, April 16, 2012

London's AIM - Zattikka Raises $20 Million in a London AIM IPO - Cash Used to Effect Three Acquisitions - Founders/Shareholders Receive $14 Million in Cash

Simultaneous with the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO, the Company completed three acquisitions, valued at $47 million, where the founders/shareholders of the acquired companies received $14 million in cash plus $12 million in notes and $13 million in London AIM-listed shares, for a 36% stake in the London AIM-listed public company, and the potential for deferred consideration of up to $10 million in cash based upon the achievement of 2012/13 performance targets.  The acquired companies had net assets of $2 million.

The London Stock Exchange AIM IPO was backed by several large, London-based AIM Institutional Investors and Private Client Brokers, a London Private Equity Group and other U.K.-based investors.


On a pro forma basis, the Company generated $12.4 million of revenue and $4.7 million of EBITDA during 2011, yielding trailing acquisition multiples of 3.8 and 10.1, respectively, upon listing on London's AIM.

CEO Mark Opzoomer said, "We are delighted to list on London's AIM to provide the capital and incentives for the entrepreneurs joining our group.  We begin with a strong group of companies operating in key gaming centers in the U.S., China and Europe, generating a mix of revenue from subscriptions, virtual good and projects with exceptionally talented employees.  We have a great opportunity before us to accelerate the growth of this initial group across multiple platforms and to create a world-class games entertainment group."

Overview of Listing on London's AIM
Zattikka, with its main operations in San Francisco, California, and Austin, Texas, raised $20 million in its recent IPO on the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM).

Simultaneous with the London AIM IPO, the Company completed three acquisitions, valued at $47 million, where the founders/shareholders of the acquired companies received $14 million in cash plus $12 million in notes, due in 2013, and $13 million in London Stock Exchange AIM-listed shares, for a 36% stake in the London AIM-listed Company, and the potential for deferred consideration of up to $10 million in cash based upon the achievement of 2012/13 performance targets.  The acquired companies had net assets of $2 million.

Zattikka’s three Founders identified the online and mobile, social/casual, interactive games entertainment market as highly fragmented and experiencing rapid growth, which they plan to capitalize on by effecting acquisitions and accelerating organic growth, with the goal of becoming a large-scale, diverse games developer and publisher across key digital platforms, geographically focused on the U.S., China and Europe.  The Company was formed specifically to effect the initial acquisitions of Hattrick, Concept Art House and Sneaky Games.  The Founders retained a 6% stake in the London AIM-listed Company.

Hattrick was founded in 1997 and is based in Sweden with 23 employees.  Hattrick’s original game is free-to-play online where the player is a soccer manager who creates a club, builds a team and competes against others in real-time.  Hattrick’s second game is a community-based, music industry role-playing game where players strive for fame in a virtual music industry.  Both are upgradable via subscriptions.

Concept Art House was founded in 2005 and is based in San Francisco, California with 13 employees and has a substantial presence in Shanghai, China with 116 employees.  Concept Art House undertakes project-based art and design work for game developers and utilizes a revenue-sharing business model.

Sneaky Games was founded in 2009 and is based in Austin, Texas with 20 employees.  Their three games are all social, mid-core fantasy role-playing games, one of which was commissioned by NBC Universal’s Syfy Channel, designed around their weekly programming, where revenue is shared.  Sneaky Games utilizes a ‘freemium’ business model, which seeks to engage users so that they return on a regular basis, converting some to paying players who purchase virtual goods to enhance the experience.

Zattikka is the successor to U.K.-based, online games company Expedite 5, which developed its own Social Network Analytic Platform (SNAP), a cloud-based analytics and metrics platform.  SNAP is capable of reporting on any game, regardless of the platform, collecting granular metrics data as games are played; allowing for aggregation, storage and reporting of that data in real-time.  SNAP allows the product development team to analyze the success of individual game features, based upon actual user behavior, and identifies areas of the game for improvement in order to enhance user engagement, retention, virality and monetization.  The Company estimates that for every 10 games published, it will collect 250 million pieces of data per day.  Zattikka’s CEO was a Director of Autonomy (now part of HP) and one of the Non-Executive Directors was their COO and General Counsel, therefore, the integration of SNAP across all of the Company’s games and the ‘Big Data’ implications of SNAP are core to the future strategy.

Key London AIM Listing Metrics
  • $20.0m gross was raised in the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO, $15.1m net of offering costs
  • Offering costs on London's AIM amounted to 24.8% of the gross capital raised 
    • Change of London AIM Nominated Adviser (Nomad) and London AIM Nominated Broker and acquisition complexities accounted for ½ of offering cost 
    • Undertaken on a ‘best efforts’ basis, as opposed to being underwritten 
      • London AIM Nominated Broker commission of 5.0% 
      • Corporate finance fee of £250k ($400k) 
      • 18-month warrant over 1.0% of the enlarged share capital at the IPO price
  • The aggregate acquisition consideration consisted of: 
    • $14.1m of cash 
    • $12.6m in London AIM-listed shares 
    • $12.1m of 5% notes, due in 2013 or convertible into shares at the holder’s option 
    • $10.3m of deferred consideration, in cash, based upon 2012/13 performance targets 
    • Less $1.7m of net assets
  • Valuation of: 
    • $37.1m, assuming no deferred consideration is earned 
    • $47.4m, assuming the maximum deferred consideration is earned
  • Trailing revenue multiple on the London Stock Exchange's AIM of 3.0 or 3.8
  • Trailing P/E ratio on London's AIM of 9.8 or 12.5
  • Trailing EBITDA multiple on London's AIM of 7.9 or 10.1
  • Opening market capitalization upon listing on London's AIM of $34.8m
  • Free float on London's AIM of 46%

Key Financial Metrics

(in USD millions)
Y/E 12/31/09[1]
Y/E 12/31/10
Y/E 12/31/11[2]
Δ ’09 - ‘10
Δ ’10 - ‘11






Revenue
$6.9
$9.5
$12.4
  +38%
+31%
Cost of Goods Sold
 0.2
 1.1
   2.0
+450%
+82%
Administrative Expenses
 3.5
 5.7
   5.9
  +63%
  +4%
Operating Income
 3.2
 2.7
   4.5
   -16%
+67%
Interest Expense
 0.0
 0.1
   0.2
   N/A
 N/A
Tax Benefit/Expense[3]
 0.0
-0.1
   0.5
   N/A
 N/A
Net Income
 3.2
 2.7
   3.8
   -16%
+41%
EBITDA
 3.4
 3.0
   4.7
   -12%
+57%
Total Assets
 3.6
 4.7
   6.5
  +31%
+38%

Since the Zattikka's London AIM IPO completed within nine months of the latest audited financial statements, unaudited, comparative, stub period financials were not required and the Company chose to not provide updated management accounts.

London AIM Shareholder Base
Zattikka is the successor to U.K.-based online games company Expedite 5.  The founders and other shareholders of Expedite 5 received 1.4 million shares in connection with the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO and the founders and other shareholders of Hattrick, Concept Art House and Sneaky Games received an aggregate of 8.0 million London AIM-listed shares.  These relative shareholdings are presented retrospectively in the table below so as to illustrate the eventual ownership stakes and related dilutive effect of the 12.6 million shares issued for cash in the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO, leaving the Company with 22.0 million shares outstanding.

Shareholder
   Pre-IPO %
   Post-IPO %



Founders/Shareholders of Hattrick, Concept Art House and Sneaky Games
  85.3
   36.2[4]
Founders of the Company
  14.7
     6.24
London Institutional Investor (Fund Manager)
-
  18.7
London Institutional Investor (Fund Manager ) and Private Client Broker
-
  11.5
London Private Equity Group
-
    7.2
London Institutional Investor (Fund Manager)
-
    3.6
London Institutional Investor (Fund Manager)
-
    3.2
Other New U.K. Investors
-
  13.4
     Totals
100.0
100.0

Beyond the obvious benefits of creating $14 million of immediate liquidity for the founders and other shareholders of the three acquired companies and providing general working capital, the Company has new U.K.-based London AIM investors from which to create additional post-IPO liquidity on London's AIM and general access to the London AIM capital markets for future financings.  The increased profile from being public should enhance the Company’s marketing and business development efforts and enable it to more easily execute on its ‘buy-and-build’ strategy, most likely with the use of shares.  Finally, the Company put in place a limited long-term incentive plan, similar to a share option plan, which could be expanded to include other employees and Board members and used as an incentive to attract new employees and Board members.

London AIM Board of Directors and Corporate Governance
The Company’s Board consists of three Executive Directors (CEO, President and CFO), a Non-Executive Chairman and five Non-Executive Directors (four of whom are Independent); all with solid resumes and a good blend of complementary experiences and skill sets.  The Company established an Audit Committee and a Remuneration Committee, each consisting of three members, all of whom are Independent, except for the Non-Executive Chairman being a member of the Remuneration Committee.  The Company’s Board intends to meet at least four times each year.

The Company also established an Executive Board, which is also led by the Non-Executive Chairman, and includes all three of the Executive Directors.  The Company’s Executive Board intends to meet at least monthly.

Companies listed on London's AIM are not required to comply with the U.K. Corporate Governance Code (the Combined Code), which is mandatory for companies listed on the London Stock Exchange’s Main Market; however, the Company intends to observe the requirements of the Combined Code to the extent considered appropriate in light of the Company’s size, stage-of-development and resources.  The Company also intends to follow the Corporate Governance Guidelines for Smaller Quoted Companies, which are published by the Quoted Companies Alliance.

London AIM Legal Considerations
Even though the Company considers its main country of operation to be the U.S., since the Company is incorporated in the U.K. and its ‘place of central management and control’ is in the U.K., the three significant differences between U.S. and U.K. corporate law automatically apply as follows:
  1. Pre-emption rights (i.e. anti-dilution) – Shareholders must be offered the opportunity to participate in the issuance of additional London Stock Exchange AIM-listed shares for cash.[5]
  2. Notifiable Interests – Shareholders are required to notify the Company of, and the Company is required to publicly announce, holdings at or above the 3% level and whenever a full percentage point is breached in either direction.
  3. Takeovers (i.e. mandatory offer) – If any party, or parties acting in concert, accumulates a holding of 30% or more, they must make a cash offer to the other shareholders at the highest price they paid for the Company’s AIM-listed shares during the last 12 months. 
The London Stock Exchange AIM IPO was not subject to Regulation S of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933; therefore, the shares are eligible for dematerialization and trading within CREST, the most common electronic system for the holding and transfer of London AIM-listed shares in the U.K.  As such, it was not necessary to appoint a Depository and create Depository Interests, as would be the case for a company domiciled outside the U.K. or one of its Crown Dependencies, the Channel Islands or Isle of Man.

London AIM Accounting Considerations
Since the Company is incorporated in the U.K., it is required to report using IFRS.  While British pounds Sterling is the functional currency for Expedite 5 and Hattrick, both companies chose to adopt the U.S. Dollar as their reporting currency, an accounting policy that will be followed by the Company when it prepares its first set of financial statements.  The functional and reporting currency for Concept Art House and Sneaky Games is the U.S. Dollar.

The U.K. Member Firm of an international accountancy network acted as Reporting Accountant and the U.K. Member Firm of another international accountancy network acted as Auditor, except for Hattrick, which was audited by the Gibraltar Member Firm of an entirely different international accountancy network.  Since the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO completed within nine months of the latest audited financial statements, unaudited, comparative, stub period financials were not required and the Company chose to not provide updated management accounts.

An unaudited pro forma statement of net assets is never required in connection with a London AIM IPO but was provided to illustrate the pre-IPO positions of the acquired companies, the net proceeds from the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO and the impact of the cash paid, notes issued and deferred consideration recorded to effect the acquisitions.

Other
The Company’s Nominated Adviser (Nomad) did not require the preparation of any Experts’ Reports; however, certain information contained in the AIM Admission Document was sourced from third parties, which the Company believes was accurately reproduced and no material facts were omitted.

[1]  Only includes Hattrick since Concept Art House and Sneaky Games were immaterial during 2009.
[2]  Extrapolated, for comparative purposes, based upon the audited results for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011.
[3]  From a financial perspective, Hattrick is the most significant of the three acquired companies and is incorporated in Gibraltar.  Hattrick was exempt from Gibraltar corporation tax through 2010; however, the Gibraltar corporation tax rate is now 10%.
[4]  Subject to a 12-month lock-in and customary orderly market provisions on London's AIM for a further 12 months.
[5]  It is customary for London AIM-listed companies to have a standing authorization from their shareholders for the issuance of London AIM-listed shares for cash of up to 10% of the then outstanding shares over a 12-month period.  This flexibility increases the certainty and speed of small capital raises and reduces transaction costs, since further communications with, and approvals from, shareholders are not required.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

London's AIM - U.S. Company IPO and Secondary Offering Activity - 2011

U.S. companies accounted for 16% of the IPOs on London's AIM during 2011, more than from any country outside the U.K.  While London Stock Exchange AIM IPO investors remain selective, they desire exposure to USD assets and revenue streams from high-quality, growth-oriented companies operating in developed markets.

Four of the seven U.S. company IPO listings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM are featured in this post, with pre-money revenue multiples range from 4.5 to 5.7.  The relative surge of U.S. companies completing IPOs on London's AIM since 2005 is expected to continue, with the current U.S. market share of 5% of the 1,100 companies listed on London's AIM rising to 10% by the end of the decade.

Highlights 
  • U.S. companies account for 16% (7 of 45) of London Stock Exchange AIM IPOs during 2011
    • More than any other country, except the U.K.
  • Four of the seven U.S. company London Stock Exchange AIM IPOs during 2011 are featured in this newsletter
    • Spectra Systems - Providence, Rhode Island - Industrials
      • Raised $22.8m, Market Cap $55.5m, Pre-Money Revenue Multiple 4.5
    • MyCelx Technologies - Gainesville, Georgia - Oil & Gas
      • Raised $19.7m, Market Cap $44.3, Pre-Money Revenue Multiple 5.7
    • TLA Worldwide - California and New York - Media
      • Raised $28.8m in equity and debt to effect acquisitions valued at $54.5m
  • 2005 - 2007, U.S. companies account for 8% (50 of 589) of ‘operating company’ London AIM IPOs
  • 2008 - 2011, U.S. companies account for 12% (12 of 104) of ‘operating company’ London AIM IPOs
    • London AIM Investors remain cautious and risk adverse, desire exposure to US$ assets/revenue
    • London AIM investors seek high-quality, growth-oriented companies from developed markets
  • Currently 5% (56 of 1,143) of the companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM are from the U.S.
  • End-of-decade expectation is that 10% of London's AIM will consist of U.S. companies
  • Given market conditions, prospective issuers should carefully consider:
  • £557m raised from secondary offerings on London's AIM for 42 U.S. companies listed on London's AIM since 2009
  • 75% of all U.S. companies listed on London's AIM have completed at least one secondary offering on London's AIM since 2009
  • Industry and geographic dispersion of the 56 U.S. companies listed on London's AIM below

U.S. Company London AIM IPOs - Macro View
The tables below for the entire London Stock Exchange's AIM show that IPOs on London's AIM held steady during 2011 and that ‘operating companies’ continued their return to London's AIM, accounting for 84% of the companies and 92% of the gross funds raised.  Generally speaking, compared to 2010, the companies that completed IPOs on the London Stock Exchange's AIM during 2011 were smaller and stronger and simply required less growth capital.

Entire Market
All Companies
Number of
London AIM IPOs
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
2008
  38
   918
24
2009
  13
     610*
  47*
2010
  46
1,017
22
2011
  45
   560
12
Total
142
3,105
22
*  Includes two large London AIM IPOs focused on acquiring distressed real estate and commercial businesses.  If excluded, London AIM IPO funds raised drops to £248m.

Entire Market
‘Operating Companies’*
Number of 
London AIM IPOs
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
2008
  27
   523
19
2009
    3
    16
  5
2010
  36
   723
20
2011
  38
   516
14
Total
104
1,778
17
*  Generally excludes SPACs, Investing Companies and Investment and Real Estate Funds.

Historically, U.S. companies listed on London's AIM have accounted for less than 5% of London's AIM, however, since 2005, there has been a relative surge of U.S. companies completing IPOs on London's AIM.  From 2005 - 2007 and 2008 - 2011, 8% and 12%, respectively, of all ‘operating company’ IPOs on the London Stock Exchange's AIM were of U.S. companies.  With a limited number of data points each year, it’s difficult to draw firm conclusions; however, it is noteworthy that 16% of London AIM IPOs during 2011 were of U.S. companies.  The medium-term expectation is that U.S. companies listed on London's AIM will account for approximately 10% of all companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM by decade’s end; growing from 56 to over 100.


United States
All Companies
Number of London AIM IPOs

Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)

Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
2008
    4
   123
31
2009
    -
       -
              N/A
2010
    2
     52
26
2011
    7
     45
  6
Total
  13
   220
17


United States
‘Operating Companies’*
Number of London AIM IPOs

Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)

Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
2008
    4
   123
31
2009
    -
       -
              N/A
2010
    2
     52
26
2011
    6
     42
  7
Total
  12
   217
18

While it is encouraging that London Stock Exchange AIM IPO activity has picked up over the last two years, London AIM IPO activity remains below trend (50 - 150) and is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future.  While London AIM investors remain cautious and risk adverse, it is clear from the relative surge of U.S. companies completing IPOs on the London Stock Exchange's AIM since 2005 that they desire exposure to USD assets and revenue streams from high-quality, growth-oriented companies operating in developed markets.

U.S. Company London AIM IPOs - 2011’s Featured Transactions
The table and summaries below provide some high-level insights into four of the U.S. company IPOs on the London Stock Exchange's AIM during 2011.  Further details can be found by clicking on the company name, which leads to a comprehensive, four-page summary of each transaction.

The diversity of the sectors in which these four U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM operate is worth noting and reinforces the message to private companies seeking additional growth capital for the next stage of their development that London's AIM is open to companies from all sectors.  The three most important factors, in the eyes of prospective U.K. investors, are the quality of the company’s management team, international operations/plans and future growth prospects.

In terms of valuation, it appears appropriate to assess Spectra Systems and MyCelx Technologies using their pre-money revenue multiples, whereas TLA Worldwide can be assessed using traditional valuation metrics; the Adjusted EBITDA multiple and P/E ratio.


(in USD millions)





AIM Super-Sector
Industrials
Oil & Gas
Healthcare
Media





Gross Capital Raised
      $22.8
      $19.7
$4.8
$18.82
Opening Market Capitalization
55.5
44.3
  5.3
  54.53
Revenue
  7.3
  4.3
 N/A
11.4
EBITDA
  0.6
  0.5
 N/A
 N/A
Adjusted EBITDA
  0.8
 N/A
 N/A
  5.5
Net Income
  0.4
  0.3
 N/A
   4.94





(Multiples/Ratio)




Pre-Money Revenue
  4.5
  5.7
 N/A
  4.8
Post-Money Revenue
  7.6
10.3
 N/A
 N/A
Pre-Money EBITDA
 54.5[1]
 49.21
 N/A
 N/A
Pre-Money Adjusted EBITDA
 40.11
 N/A
 N/A
  9.9
Pre-Money P/E
 81.81
 82.01
 N/A
 11.14

Spectra Systems invents, develops, manufactures and markets advanced, technology-based products used to mark, track and authenticate high-value goods.  The Company’s security materials include proprietary and patented consumables and hardware and software systems which authenticate bank notes, documents, passports and products such as pharmaceuticals, software, optical disks and branded luxury goods.  The Company’s consumables, hardware and software often work together as a public and/or covert ‘lock-and-key’ system in the authentication process.  Spectra Systems was founded in 1996 to commercialize technology licensed from Brown University, is based in Providence, Rhode Island and has 20 employees.  Future growth opportunities are focused on the United Kingdom, India and China.

MyCelx Technologies
is a clean water technology company focused on the oil and gas, power, marine and heavy manufacturing sectors.  The Company’s system consists of equipment (a coalescer and/or a polisher) and consumable filtration media infused with an organic chemical polymer that creates cohesion, as opposed to provoking separation.  The footprint of MyCelx’s system is 25% that of competing technologies, is cost-effective and achieves better results by permanently and immediately removing free, emulsified and dissolved hydrocarbons from water upon contact to levels of 0 - 10 parts per million at any flow rate.  MyCelx was co-founded in 1994 by the scientist who invented the polymer and an experienced oil industry executive, is based in Gainesville, Georgia and has 18 employees.  Future growth opportunities are initially focused on the Middle East and Gulf of Mexico.  An important element of MyCelx’s London Stock Exchange AIM IPO was its ability to raise $5.8m of the $19.7m from tax-advantaged Venture Capital Trust (VCT) and Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) Investors.

Port Erin Biopharma Investments provides a good, generic example of a London AIM-listed Investing Company, which could be formed for any purpose, however, an element precedent is association with and/or backing from individuals who are ‘known quantities’ with demonstrable track records of success.  In the case of Port Erin Biopharma, the Company’s Non-Executive Chairman is a renowned global investor, entrepreneur and author with an estimated net worth of $800 million.  The Company intends to co-invest, wherever possible, alongside its Chairman in private and public biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies he identifies, primarily on the West Coast of the United States.  The Company chose to list on London's AIM for its IPO for many of the typical reasons; AIM’s public profile, its broad investor base, liquidity on London's AIM and access to London AIM institutional investors.  While the Company’s Chairman is obviously wealthy, as is often the case, the accumulation of great wealth is the result of intelligence, hard work and the use of other people’s money, therefore, it is access to the world’s deepest pool of internationally-focused investors on the London Stock Exchange's AIM that will be most important over the medium-to-long-term.

TLA Worldwide was founded to effect the simultaneous acquisition of two companies; one based in California, founded in 2004, and the other based in New York, founded in 2000.  The purpose of the acquisitions, and the future strategy, is to capitalize on the opportunity to consolidate and professionalize the business of baseball athlete representation and create a full-service offering with the addition of sports marketing and management.  The athlete representation market is highly fragmented with 60 - 70 groups throughout the U.S.; with no one group having a market share of athletes greater than 10%.  The acquisitions were valued at $55 million, where the eight Members of the acquired LLCs received the entire $26 million of net proceeds from the financing, plus the equivalent of $15 million in deferred shares, for an eventual 43% stake in the London AIM-listed public Company, and the potential for earn-out / retention bonus payments of up to $14 million over five years.  Major League Baseball (MLB) is broadcast in more than 200 countries and 28% of the players (47% of minor leaguers) were born outside the U.S.  The strong financial performance and complementary nature of the acquired companies, along with MLB’s strategy to further internationalize the game, provided the compelling rationale for the London Stock Exchange AIM IPO and valuation.  An important element of TLA Worldwide’s London AIM IPO was its ability to raise $11.3m of the $18.8m from tax-advantaged Venture Capital Trust (VCT) and Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) investors.

U.S. Company London AIM Secondary Offerings
The 56 U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM account for 4.9% of the 1,143 companies listed on London's AIM and their share of secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM was quite consistent with that weighting during 2009 and 2010.  Over the years, the U.S. companies listed on London's AIM have accessed capital, grown, and are now more advanced in terms of their stage-of-development relative to London's AIM as a whole.  As such, many are now self-sustaining and required less growth capital during 2011.

When reviewing the table below for the secondary offering activity on the London Stock Exchange's AIM as a whole, one anomaly should be adjusted for in order to arrive at a fair comparison.  During 2009, there were three large London AIM Placing & Open Offers which raised an aggregate of £1.1 billion for real estate investment, development and management companies.  Historically, the vast majority of secondary offerings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM take the form of Placings and are much smaller in size.  When the adjustments are made, the aggregate secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM during 2009 drops from £4.9 billion to £3.8 billion and the average drops from £6.38 million to £5.03 million.


Entire Market
All Companies
Number of
London AIM Secondaries*

Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)

Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
2009
   762
      4,861**
    6.38**
2010
   691
  5,738
8.30
2011
   524
  3,616
6.90
Total
1,977
14,215
7.19
*   This is the number of discrete secondary offerings on London's AIM.  Some companies completed more than one secondary offering on London's AIM per year.
** Includes three large Placing & Open Offers on London's AIM for real estate companies.  If excluded, the gross and average drop to £3,814m and £5.03m.

When reviewing the table below for the secondary offering activity of the U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM, one anomaly should be adjusted for in order to arrive at a fair comparison.  During 2010, one U.S. company listed on London's AIM attracted a strategic investment of £152 million ($243 million), ultimately leading to an outright acquisition.  If this large strategic investment is excluded, the average funds raised from secondary offerings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM drops from £14.53 million to £6.89 million, more in line with the averages for 2009 and 2011.


United States
All Companies
Number of
London AIM
Secondaries*

Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)

Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
2009
23
184
  8.00
2010
19
    276**
    14.53**
2011
17
  97
  5.71
Total
59
557
  9.44
*   This is the number of companies that completed secondary offerings on London's AIM as opposed to the number of discrete secondary offerings on London's AIM.
** Includes one large strategic investment of £152m.  If excluded, the gross and average drop to £124m and £6.89m.

Of the 59 U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM that completed secondary offerings since 2009, 17 completed secondary offerings on London's AIM in more than one year, therefore, 75% of the U.S. companies listed on London's AIM (42 of 56) have completed at least one secondary offering on London's AIM since 2009.

The distribution of gross funds raised by these 59 U.S. companies listed on London's AIM is illustrated in the chart below.  Since 2009, 86% (51 of 59) of the U.S. companies listed on London's AIM that have completed secondary offerings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM have raised between £1 and £30 million.


U.S. Company London AIM Selling Shareholder Activity
The ability of existing shareholders to sell some or all of their holdings in a London Stock Exchange AIM IPO depends on a variety of factors; the most important of which are the strength of the company and the level of investor support.  Historically, from 2005 – 2007, 22% of U.S. company IPOs on London's AIM included selling shareholders who were often either founders of the company, longstanding members of executive management or the board of directors, commercial partners who had made a strategic investment in the company or VCs/PEGs who invested in and nurtured the company for several years prior to its London Stock Exchange AIM IPO.

Two of the four U.S. company IPOs on London's AIM during 2008 included selling shareholders.  In one of these transactions, the Chairman and President, who had been with the company since 1969, sold 30% of his stake for £26 million ($42 million).  One of the two U.S. company IPOs on London's AIM during 2010 included selling shareholders.  In that London Stock Exchange AIM IPO, the selling shareholders included a PEG, a VC, a Strategic Investor and several Angel Investors for an aggregate of £19 million ($30 million).  No U.S. company IPO on London's AIM during 2011 included selling shareholders.

While selling shareholders are most common in conjunction with a London Stock Exchange AIM IPO, U.S. company insiders have sold in the aftermarket in organized transactions on London's AIM on three occasions since 2004; twice as part of secondary offerings on London's AIM and once on a standalone basis.  In all three instances, the companies were performing exceptionally well with the organized insider selling driven by a need to “satisfy excess demand” for the company’s AIM-listed shares.  There were no such transactions from 2009 – 2011; however, insider selling in the normal course of daily share trading on London's AIM is commonplace.

U.S. Company AIM IPO Accredited Investor and Qualified Institutional Buyer (QIB) Activity
U.S. accredited investors and QIBs are permitted to participate in London AIM IPOs and secondary offerings on London's AIM.  Historically, from 2005 – 2008, they have provided 20% of the funding for U.S. company IPOs on London's AIM and 20% of the secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM for those companies.

From 2009 – 2011, 27% (16 of 59) of the U.S. companies that completed secondary offerings on London's AIM were at least partially financed by accredited investors or QIBs, providing 40% of the total funds raised, however, this is skewed by the £152 million ($243 million) discussed above and would have otherwise only been 17%.

U.S. Company AIM IPO Industry and Geographic Dispersion
Companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's (LSE) Alternative Investment Market (AIM) are organized into 90 sub-sectors which feed into 40 sectors which feed into 10 super sectors.  The 56 U.S. companies that are listed on London's AIM are quite diverse and operate in eight of the 10 super sectors (oil and gas / alternative energy, basic materials, industrials, healthcare, technology, financials, consumer services and consumer goods).

There is a concentration of oil and gas exploration and production companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM in Texas, which includes two oil and gas field technology services companies.  The other major concentration is in industrial and consumer technology companies listed on London's AIM, including; digital media, biotech and cleantech, between Boston and Washington D.C. and in California.

Industrials is comprised mainly of a wide range of industrial technology companies listed on London's AIM; from body armor for the military and other customers to the marking, tracking and authentication of high-value goods to B2B electronic payment companies listed on London's AIM.

Within Basic Materials, three of the eight U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM produce chemicals/compounds for the health and growth of fish, plants and agriculture, three are mining concerns, one is a forestry investment fund and one is a clean water antimicrobial technology company listed on London's AIM. 

Consumer Services consists of a media company with some unique technology listed on London's AIM, a restaurant operator and an athlete representation agency.  The Consumer Goods company listed on London's AIM is developing fuel cells for vehicles.

 

[1]  Not particularly meaningful given the relatively small denominators.
2  In addition to the $18.8m of equity capital raised from U.K. investors in the London AIM IPO, the company also secured a $10.0m debt facility from a U.S. bank.
3  Since the purpose of this London AIM IPO was to effect two acquisitions, this is the value of the acquired companies, which is more relevant for analysis.
4  Since the acquired companies were LLCs, this is pre-tax net income.  Assuming tax at 40%, net income and P/E ratio would be 2.9m and 18.8.