- London's AIM IPO activity accelerates, H1 2010 (16 London Stock Exchange AIM IPOs) exceeds the full year 2009 (13 London AIM IPOs)
- First U.S. company listing on London's AIM since July 2008 does not occur until October 2010
- ‘Operating companies’ return to listing on London's AIM, account for 75% of H1 2010 London Stock Exchange AIM IPOs, mirror image of 2009
- However, London AIM IPO market remains fragile and below trend (50 - 150 yearly) for foreseeable future
- Given market conditions, prospective issuers should carefully consider:
- Suitability before embarking on the London Stock Exchange AIM listing process
- Key advisers, most notably Nominated Advisers (Nomads) and Nominated Brokers
- Surprisingly, only 4 of the 16 companies listing on London's AIM had revenues > £1 million (range £1m - £58m)
- Those 4 companies listing on London's AIM broadly in the tech space (digital media and cleantech)
- Other 12 companies listing on London's AIM broadly in natural resources space or ‘investment vehicles’
- Secondary offerings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM remain strong
- U.S. companies listing on London's AIM account for 6% of all London AIM IPOs since 2008
- U.S. companies listing on London's AIM account for 10% of all AIM ‘operating company’ listings on London's AIM since 2008
- Respectively account for 7% and 16% of gross funds raised from London AIM IPOs since 2008
- £350m raised from secondary offerings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM for 26 U.S. companies listed on London's AIM since 2009
- 48% of all U.S. companies listed on London's AIM have completed at least one secondary offering on London's AIM since 2009
- U.S. companies listed on London's AIM make up 4% of London's AIM but capture 5% of secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM
- Selling shareholder activity on the London Stock Exchange's AIM continues at historic levels since 2008
- U.S. Accredited Investor and Qualified Institutional Buyer participation on London's AIM increases
London AIM IPOs
The key takeaway from comparing the first two tables below is the return of ‘operating companies’ listing on the London Stock Exchange's AIM. The £18 million ($29 million) average raised
on London's AIM by these 12 ‘operating companies’ listing on London's AIM is consistent with 2008 when 27 ‘operating
companies’ listed on London's AIM and raised an average of £19 million ($30 million).
While the return of ‘operating companies’ listing on the London Stock Exchange's AIM is a
positive sign, the London AIM IPO market remains below trend (50 - 150 yearly) and is
expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. In addition to the current macroeconomic
situation, the Secondary Offering market on London's AIM has been booming (£2.1 billion
or $3.4 billion raised on London's AIM during the first half of 2010) as a result of attractive
valuations for companies listed on London's AIM that are ‘known quantities’. The strength of the Secondary Offering market
on the London Stock Exchange's AIM is a positive sign for London AIM IPOs over the medium to longer term as London AIM investors remain
confident in the market; however, the shifting of their risk profiles towards
London Stock Exchange AIM IPOs is sure to be gradual.
It was surprising that the types of ‘operating companies’
listing on London's AIM during the first half of 2010 fell into two very distinct
categories; those companies listing on London's AIM with revenue traction and profits, or very close to
profitability, and natural resource plays (mining and oil and gas) at a very
nascent stage. The latter all had owned
or identifiable assets, solid geological studies and exceptional management
teams with demonstrable track records of success.
Entire Market
All Companies
|
Number of London AIM IPOs
|
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
H1 2008
|
31
|
830
|
27
|
H2 2008
|
7
|
88
|
13
|
H1 2009
|
2
|
222
|
111
|
H2 2009
|
11
|
388
|
35
|
H1 2010
|
16
|
350
|
22
|
Total
|
67
|
1,878
|
28
|
Exclusive of SPACs and Investment and Real Estate Funds:
Entire Market
‘Operating Companies’
|
Number of London AIM IPOs
|
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
H1 2008
|
22
|
455
|
21
|
H2 2008
|
5
|
68
|
14
|
H1 2009
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
H2 2009
|
3
|
16
|
5
|
H1 2010
|
12
|
211
|
18
|
Total
|
42
|
750
|
18
|
All of the U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM in the table below that completed
IPOs on London's AIM during 2008 are ‘operating companies’.
U.S. companies listed on London's AIM were relatively immune from the ‘investment vehicle’ IPO
phenomenon.
U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM have accounted for 6% of all London AIM IPOs and 10% of
all ‘operating company’ listings on London's AIM since 2008.
While London AIM listing activity has been muted over the last two-and-a-half years, it is
relevant to note that these London AIM-listed companies have garnered 7% and 16%, respectively,
of the gross funds raised on the London Stock Exchange's AIM.
While the limited number of U.S. company listings on London's AIM since 2008 makes
it difficult to draw firm conclusions, it is believed that the upward trend will
persist from the £24 million ($38 million) average raised by the 50 U.S.
‘operating companies’ listed on London's AIM that completed London Stock Exchange AIM IPOs from 2005 – 2007.
U.S. Companies |
Number of London AIM IPOs
|
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
H1 2008
|
3
|
70
|
23
|
H2 2008
|
1
|
53
|
53
|
H1 2009
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
H2 2009
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
H1 2010
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
Total
|
4
|
123
|
31
|
London AIM Dilution
The chart below highlights an interesting shift in the
listings on London's AIM that occurred during 2008, a substantial decrease in London Stock Exchange AIM IPO dilution of
existing shareholders. 2009 is viewed as
an anomaly given the lack of activity.
There are two main reasons for this shift. First, the London Stock Exchange (LSE) codified the AIM Rules for
Nominated Advisers (Nomads) in early 2007 which has increased the scrutiny of
prospective new entrants by Nominated Advisers (Nomads) since the Nominated Adviser (Nomad) vouches to the London Stock Exchange as to a
company’s suitability for admission to London's AIM.
Second, London AIM investors have become more risk adverse. Consequently, the quality of the companies
listing on London's AIM has increased and, as a result, the IPO dilution of
existing shareholders has decreased on London's AIM.
London AIM Secondary
Offerings (see tables and chart below)
When reviewing the “Entire Market, All Companies” listed on London's AIM table below, one anomaly should be adjusted for in order to arrive at a fair
comparison. During the second half of
2009, there were three large London Stock Exchange AIM Placing & Open Offers which raised an
aggregate of £1.0 billion on London's AIM for real estate investment, development and
management companies. Historically, the
vast majority of secondary offerings on London's AIM take the form of Placings and are
much smaller in size. When the
adjustments are made, the aggregate secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM during the
second half of 2009 drops from £3.4 billion to £2.4 billion and the average
drops from £7.93 million to £5.63 million.
While the 54 U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM account for 4% of
the 1,235 companies listed London's AIM, they have captured 5% of the
secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM since 2009.
However, when one large secondary offering on London's AIM during the first half of 2010
that raised £152 million ($243 million) is excluded, the U.S. company share of
secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM drops to 3%.
Excluding this company also brings the average funds raised by the U.S.
companies listed on London's AIM during the second half of 2010 down to £2.14 million, however, there
wasn’t enough activity for this average to be meaningful, therefore, the
average for the two half years comprising 2009 of £5.94 million is more
representative.
Entire Market
All Companies
|
Number of
London AIM
Secondaries*
|
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
H1 2009
|
335
|
1,433
|
4.28
|
H2 2009
|
427
|
3,387
|
7.93
|
H1 2010
|
308
|
2,107
|
6.84
|
Total
|
1,070
|
6,927
|
6.47
|
* This is the number of discrete secondary
offerings on London's AIM. Some companies
completed more than one secondary offering on London's AIM in some periods.
All U.S. Companies |
Number of
London AIM
Secondaries*
|
Gross Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
Average Funds Raised
(in £ millions)
|
H1 2009
|
14
|
64
|
4.57
|
H2 2009
|
17
|
120
|
7.06
|
H1 2010
|
8
|
167
|
20.88
|
Total
|
39
|
351
|
9.00
|
* This is the number of companies that
completed secondary offerings on London's AIM as opposed to the number of discrete secondary
offerings on London's AIM.
Of the 39 U.S. companies that completed secondary offerings
on the London Stock Exchange's AIM since 2009, 13 completed secondary offerings on London's AIM in more than one half year,
therefore, 48% of the U.S. companies listed on London's AIM (26 of 54) have completed at least one
secondary offering on London's AIM since 2009.
Since 2009, 62% (24 of 39) of the U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM that have
completed secondary offerings on London's AIM have raised between £1 and £10 million.
U.S. London AIM Industry
Dispersion
Companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's (LSE) Alternative Investment Market (AIM) are organized into 90 sub-sectors which
feed into 40 sectors which feed into 10 super sectors. The 54 U.S. companies that are listed on London's AIM are
quite diverse and operate in all 10 super sectors; however, there is a
concentration of oil and gas producers listed on London's AIM in Texas and concentrations in
technology, including; digital media, biotech and cleantech, between Boston and
Washington D.C. and in California. Industrial companies listed on London's AIM
contain a mixture of cleantech companies (fuel cells and solar) and B2B
electronic payment companies. Within Basic
Materials, 50% of the London AIM-listed companies produce chemicals/compounds for the health and growth of fish, plants
and agriculture. Within Consumer
Services, 67% of the London Stock Exchange AIM-listed companies are media companies with some unique technology. Within Consumer Goods, one company listed on London's AIM is
developing fuel cells for vehicles and the other is a winery.
U.S. London AIM Selling
Shareholder Activity
The ability of existing shareholders to sell some or all of
their holdings in an London AIM IPO depends on a variety of factors; the most
important of which are the strength of the company and the level of investor
support. Historically, from 2005 – 2007,
22% of U.S. company listings on London's AIM included selling shareholders who were often
either founders of the company, longstanding members of executive management or
the board of directors, commercial partners who had made a strategic investment
in the company or VCs/PEGs who invested in and nurtured the company for several
years prior to its London AIM IPO. Two of the four U.S.
company listings on the London Stock Exchange's AIM during 2008 included selling shareholders. In one of the 2008 listings on London's AIM, the Chairman
and President, who had been with the company since 1969, sold 30% of his stake for
£26 million ($42 million).
While selling shareholders are most common in conjunction
with a London AIM IPO, U.S.
company insiders have sold in the aftermarket on London's AIM in organized transactions on
three occasions since 2004; twice as part of secondary offerings on London's AIM and once on a
standalone basis. In all three
instances, the companies listed on London's AIM were performing exceptionally well with the organized
insider selling driven by a need to “satisfy excess demand” for the company’s London Stock Exchange AIM-listed shares. There were no such transactions
during 2009 or the first half of 2010.
U.S. London AIM Accredited
Investor and Qualified Institutional Buyer (QIB) Activity
U.S.
accredited investors and QIBs are permitted to participate in London AIM IPOs and
secondary offerings on London's AIM. Historically, from
2005 – 2008, they have provided 20% of the funding for U.S. companies listing on London's AIM
and 20% of the secondary offering funds raised on London's AIM for those companies.
During 2009, 26% (6 of 23) of the U.S. companies listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM that
completed secondary offerings on London's AIM were at least partially financed by accredited
investors or QIBs, providing 29% of the total funds raised on London's AIM. During the first half of 2010, 38% (3 of 8)
of the U.S. companies listed on London's AIM that completed secondary offerings on London's AIM were at least partially
financed by accredited investors or QIBs, providing 92% of the total funds
raised on London's AIM, however, this is skewed by the £152 million ($243 million) discussed
above and would have otherwise only been 7%.
No comments:
Post a Comment